Arthroscopic subacromial decompression improved outcomes in situationally depressed patients compared to clinically depressed or nondepressed patients.

Background: The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient reported outcomes after arthroscopic extensive débridement of the shoulder with subacromial decompression (SAD) for subacromial impingement using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) system and evaluate if depression (Dep) (clinical or situational) impacts patients achieving a Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID). Methods: Preoperative PROMIS Physical function (PF), Mood, and Dep scores were obtained at the closest date prior to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and postoperative scores were collected at every clinical visit thereafter. Final PROMIS score used for data analysis was determined by the patients final PROMIS value between 90 to 180 days. Clinical Dep was determined by patients having a formal diagnosis of "Depression or Major Depressive Disorder" at the time of their surgery. Situationally depressed patients, those without a formal diagnosis yet exhibited symptomatic depressive symptoms, were classified by having a PROMIS-Dep cutoff scores larger than 52.5. Results: A total of 136 patients were included for final statistical analysis. 13 patients had a clinical but not situational diagnosis of Dep, 86 patients were identified who had no instance of clinical or situational Dep (nondepressed). 35 patients were situationally depressed. All three cohorts demonstrated a significant improvement in postoperative PROMIS Dep, PI, and PF score relative to their preoperative value (P = .001). Situationally depressed patients achieved greater delta PROMIS-Dep compared to patients with major depressive disorder. Depressed patients had a higher chance of achieving MCID for PROMIS-Dep compared to nondepressed patients (P = .01). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that underlying Dep did not alter the odds of obtaining MCID compared to nondepressed patients. Nonsmoking patients had significantly greater odds of achieving MCID for PF (P = .02). Discussion: Patients improved after undergoing SAD regardless of underlying Dep or depressive symptoms. Depressed patients exhibited greater change in PROMIS scores compared to nondepressed patients. Smoking remains a risk factor for postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing SAD for subacromial impingement. Identifying and counseling patients with underlying depressive symptoms without a formal major depressive disorder diagnosis may lead to improved outcomes. These findings may help guide clinicians in deciding who would benefit the most from this procedure.

Resident Performance on the Fundamentals of Arthroscopic Surgery Training (FAST) Workstation Does Not Predictably Improve With Postgraduate Year.

Purpose: To identify differences in performance on the Fundamentals of Arthroscopic Surgery Training (FAST) workstation between residents across different postgraduate years and training sites. Methods: During the 2018-2019 academic year, 102 orthopaedic surgery residents from 4 training sites completed 6 FAST modules. Failure was defined as either completion time exceeding benchmark time or commission of task-specific errors. With the exception of knot tying, each module was completed by participants twice-once with each hand serving as the camera hand. Time to completion (except for knot tying) and errors were recorded for each of the modules. Completion times and failure rates were compared between postgraduate years, seniority groups, and training sites. Results: In all modules for which time was recorded, except for the suture-passage module, there was no significant difference in time to completion based on seniority (P < .01 for suture passage and P > .05 for all others). Significant differences in completion time were observed between sites for all modules except for the suture-passage module (P = .957 for suture passage and P < .05 for all others). Site predicted failure by at least 1 measure (time or technical error) for all modules (P < .05) except for number probing and suture passage. Failure rate across training years varied for each module. Conclusions: Time to completion and rate of failure did not predictably decrease with level of training. Training site proved to be a significant predictor of performance. Factors such as hand dominance and familiarity with the equipment proved to be important considerations for some modules. Clinical Relevance: Objective assessment of arthroscopic skills among orthopaedic trainees is difficult. Using reproducible methodology to assess trainees on specific skills at all postgraduate years and at multiple training sites may provide important information about orthopaedic training.

Use of Area Deprivation Index to Predict Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic disparities correlate with worse outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. However, use of a surrogate to describe socioeconomic disadvantage has been a challenge. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) is a tool that encompasses 17 socioeconomic variables into a single metric based on census location. HYPOTHESIS: Higher ADI would result in a worse minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and have less improvement in range of motion (ROM) following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHOD: A retrospective review was performed for patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Patients in the most socioeconomically disadvantaged quartile (ADIHigh) were compared with the least disadvantaged quartile (ADILow) in the ability to reach MCID. Demographic and surgical features were assessed for attainment of MCID. RESULTS: In total 1382 patients were identified who underwent ARCR, of which a total of 306 patients met final inclusion criteria. A higher percentage of patients within the ADIHigh cohort identified as "Black" or "other" race and had government-issued insurance compared with the ADILow cohort (P < .05). The ADIHigh cohort had significantly worse postoperative forward flexion compared with the ADILow cohort (145.0°± 32.5° vs 156.3°± 23.4°; P = .001) despite starting with comparable preoperative ROM (P = .17). Logistic regression showed that ADI was the only variable significant for predicting achievement of MCID for all 3 PROMIS domains, with the ADIHigh cohort having significantly worse odds of achieving MCID Physical Function (odds ratio [OR], 0.31; P = .001), Pain Interference (OR, 0.21; P = .001), and Depression (OR, 0.28; P = .001). Meanwhile, age, sex, body mass index, and smoking history were nonsignificant. Moreover, "other" for race and Medicare insurance were significant for achievement of MCID Depression but not Physical Function or Pain Interference. Finally, ADI was the main feature for predictive logistic regression modeling. CONCLUSION: ADI served as the only significant predictor for achieving MCID for all 3 PROMIS domains after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Patients who face high levels of socioeconomic disadvantage have lower rates of achieving MCID. In addition, patients with greater neighborhood disadvantage demonstrated significantly worse improvement in active forward flexion. Further investigation is required to understand the role of ADI on physical therapy compliance and to identify the barriers that prevent equitable postoperative care.

Effect of Insurance Reimbursement Status on Pre- and Postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scores After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies reported inferior patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for patients receiving workers' compensation (WC) relative to patients with commercial insurance. The extent to which alternative insurance reimbursement, including Medicaid and Medicare, influences outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair remains understudied. HYPOTHESIS: Compared with patients with commercial insurance reimbursement, patients with WC or government-issued reimbursement would report lower pre- and postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) scores, report higher pre- and postoperative PROMIS Depression (D) and Pain Interference (PI) scores, and experience smaller levels of improvement in all PROMIS domains with surgical intervention. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Demographic and surgical data were extracted from the medical record, and PROMIS domains were prospectively collected. Patients were divided into cohorts based on insurance reimbursement status. Differences between insurance-based cohorts for baseline variables, pre- and postoperative PROMIS scores, and change from baseline to final follow-up (delta) for PROMIS scores were evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis or chi-square tests. Mixed-effects linear regression models were performed to assess the influence of insurance while controlling for other variables. Survival analysis was performed to determine time to achieve minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for each PROMIS domain per cohort. RESULTS: 1252 patients underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, met inclusion criteria, and completed PROMIS questionnaires. Statistically significant differences were noted in demographic variables including age (P < .001), sex (P < .001), ethnicity (P < .001), and body mass index (P < .001) between insurance-based cohorts. Unadjusted analysis revealed significantly higher PF scores and lower PI and D scores for the group with commercial insurance relative to those with Medicare, Medicaid, and WC at 6- and 12-month follow-up (P < .01 all comparisons), except for the Medicare versus commercial subcohort analysis for PI at 6 months (P = .28). These differences persisted for the Medicare, Medicaid, and WC groups (P < .03 all comparisons) after adjustment for confounding variables in linear regression. CONCLUSIONS: The baseline characteristics of patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair differed based on insurance reimbursement. Patients with commercial insurance reported improved physical function, decreased pain interference, and improved mood (less depression) relative to patients with government-issued and WC insurance, with maximum improvement 6 to 12 months postoperatively. There were few significant differences between insurance groups in change of PROMIS scores from preoperative to postoperative intervals, indicating that differences in the baseline demographic and surgical characteristics of these groups accounted for differences in response to surgery.

Risk factors for loss of reduction following locked plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures in older adults.

PURPOSE: To identify characteristics associated with loss of reduction following open reduction and locked plate fixation (ORIF) of proximal humerus fractures in older adults and determine if loss of reduction affects patient reported outcomes (PROs), range of motion (ROM), and complication rates during the first postoperative year. METHODS: Patients >55 years old who underwent proximal humerus ORIF were reviewed. Patient and fracture characteristics were recorded. Fixation characteristics were measured on the initial postoperative AP radiograph including humeral head height (HHH) relative to the greater tuberosity (GT), head shaft angle (HSA), screw-calcar distance, and screw tip-joint surface distance. Loss of reduction was defined as GT displacement >5 mm or HSA displacement >10° on final follow up radiographs. Patient, fracture, and fixation characteristics were tested for association with loss of reduction. Outcomes including ROM, visual analog scale pain and PROMIS scores, and complication/reoperation rates during the first postoperative year were compared between those with or without loss of reduction. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients were identified, 23 (29.1%) of which had a loss of reduction. Calcar comminution (relative risk [RR]=2.5, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]=1.3-5.0, p<0.01), HHH <5 mm above GT (RR=2.0, CI=1.0-3.9, p = 0.048), and screw-calcar distance ≥12 mm (RR=2.1, CI=1.1-4.1, p = 0.03) were risk factors for loss of reduction. Upon multivariate analysis, calcar comminution was determined to be an independent risk factor for loss of reduction (RR=2.4, CI=1.2-4.7, p = 0.01). Loss of reduction led to higher complication (44% vs 13%, p<0.01) and reoperation rates (30% vs 7%, p<0.01), and decreased achievement of satisfactory ROM (>90° active forward flexion, 57% vs 82%, p = 0.02) compared to maintained reduction, but similar PROs. CONCLUSIONS: Calcar comminution, decreased HHH, and increased screw-calcar distance are risk factors for loss of reduction following ORIF of proximal humerus fractures. These morphologic and technical factors are important considerations for prolonged reduction maintenance.

Increasing the Educational Value of the Orthopaedic Subinternship: The Design and Implementation of a Fourth-Year Medical Student Curriculum.

INTRODUCTION: Most orthopaedic subinternships function as month-long interviews. These rotations remain relatively unstructured and lack standardization, and their overall educational value has been called into question. The goals of this educational initiative were to create a structured subinternship curriculum for orthopaedic applicants and to shift the focus of the subinternship from a month-long interview to an organized educational experience. METHODS: After review of knowledge and skills expected for early orthopaedic residency under the structure of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones, a curriculum dedicated to orthopaedic subinternships was created. Students who completed the curriculum filled out anonymous Likert scale evaluations (rating their comfort/knowledge from 0 to 10 before and after their rotation) and answered open-ended qualitative questions. RESULTS: Forty-six subinterns participated in the program over 3 years. Four weekly learning modules were designed and taught by orthopaedic residents, with faculty oversight of content and structure. Each monthly rotation began with an orthopaedic surgical skills laboratory and concluded with a case-based oral presentation. Weeks two and three covered different milestone-based topics and included didactic and skills development. Data analysis revealed that students reported notable improvement in knowledge and familiarity with each of the topics. The greatest improvements were in tibia intramedullary nailing and applying a tension band to an olecranon fracture. When asked which surgical skills station was the most helpful, 70% chose lag screw insertion and basic plating techniques. All students felt that creating their case presentation was productive. CONCLUSION: This educational initiative resulted in the successful design and implementation of a milestone-based orthopaedic surgery subinternship curriculum. The program was well received by students, contributed to learning and competency, and provided teaching opportunities for residents. The format and content of this subinternship curriculum can easily be adapted to regional and national teaching programs.

Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores predict postoperative outcome in total shoulder arthroplasty patients.

BACKGROUND: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) has recently been validated in orthopedic patients with upper-extremity disease. The purpose of this study was to describe preoperative and postoperative PROMIS scores in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) patients, compare PROMIS physical function (PF) scores with clinical functional measurements, and determine whether preoperative PROMIS scores could predict achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) postoperatively. METHODS: Preoperative and postoperative (>3 months) PROMIS scores in patients who underwent primary anatomic TSA were reviewed. Preoperative and postoperative shoulder forward flexion and external rotation were also collected. PROMIS PF, pain interference (PI), and depression scores were compared. Accuracy analyses determined whether preoperative PROMIS scores from each domain could predict postoperative achievement of the MCID in the same domain. RESULTS: The study included 62 patients. Significant improvements in PROMIS PF, PI, and depression scores, as well as forward flexion and external rotation, were found postoperatively (P < .001). The multivariate model demonstrated that preoperative PROMIS PF, PI, and depression scores were predictive of postoperative achievement of the MCID (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.70-0.87). Ninety percent cutoff scores showed that patients with a preoperative PF score lower than 31.7, PI score greater than 66.9, and depression score greater than 55.5 were more likely to achieve the MCID. CONCLUSIONS: In TSA patients, preoperative PROMIS PF, depression, and PI scores demonstrated strong to excellent abilities to predict postoperative achievement of the MCID. PROMIS PF scores were responsive to the functional improvements observed clinically. The reported cutoff scores allow surgeons to identify patients with increased or decreased probabilities of achieving a clinically meaningful improvement after TSA.

Preoperative PROMIS Scores Predict Postoperative Outcomes After Primary ACL Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) scores in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have not been fully described in the literature to date. The ability of preoperative patient-reported outcome scores to directly predict postoperative outcomes in patients who undergo primary ACL reconstruction is unknown. HYPOTHESIS: Postoperative PROMIS physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), and depression (D) scores in patients who undergo ACL reconstruction will show improvement when compared with preoperative scores. Additionally, preoperative PROMIS PF, PI, and D scores will predict which patients will not achieve a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) postoperatively. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A total of 233 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction between 2015 and 2016 and had completed PROMIS measures both preoperatively (within 60 days of surgery) and postoperatively (100-240 days after surgery) were included in this study. PROMIS PF, PI, and D scores were compared. Accuracy analyses were performed to determine whether preoperative PROMIS scores from each domain could predict postoperative achievement of MCID in the same domain. Cutoff scores were then calculated. RESULTS: PROMIS PF, PI, and D scores all showed a significant improvement after ACL reconstruction (all P < .001). Preoperative scores from all 3 PROMIS domains showed a strong ability to predict clinically meaningful improvement, as defined by MCID, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve from 0.72 to 0.84. Optimal cutoffs for preoperative PROMIS scores showed that patients with a PF score of <42.5, PI score of >56.2, or D score of >44.8 were more likely to achieve MCID. CONCLUSION: PROMIS PF, PI, and D scores improved significantly in patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction. Preoperative PROMIS PF, PI, and D scores were highly predictive of outcome in the early postoperative period. The reported cutoff scores showed high probability in predicting which patients would and would not achieve a clinically meaningful improvement.

Objective Assessment of Knot-Tying Proficiency With the Fundamentals of Arthroscopic Surgery Training Program Workstation and Knot Tester.

PURPOSE: To assess a new method for biomechanical assessment of arthroscopic knots and to establish proficiency benchmarks using the Fundamentals of Arthroscopic Surgery Training (FAST) Program workstation and knot tester. METHODS: The first study group included 20 faculty at an Arthroscopy Association of North America resident arthroscopy course (19.9 ± 8.25 years in practice). The second group comprised 30 experienced surgeons attending an Arthroscopy Association of North America fall course (17.1 ± 19.3 years in practice). The training group included 44 postgraduate year 4 or 5 orthopaedic residents in a randomized, prospective study of proficiency-based training, with 3 subgroups: group A, standard training (n = 14); group B, workstation practice (n = 14); and group C, proficiency-based progression using the knot tester (n = 16). Each subject tied 5 arthroscopic knots backed up by 3 reversed hitches on alternating posts. Knots were tied under video control around a metal mandrel through a cannula within an opaque dome (FAST workstation). Each suture loop was stressed statically at 15 lb for 15 seconds. A calibrated sizer measured loop expansion. Knot failure was defined as 3 mm of loop expansion or greater. RESULTS: In the faculty group, 24% of knots "failed" under load. Performance was inconsistent: 12 faculty had all knots pass, whereas 2 had all knots fail. In the second group of practicing surgeons, 21% of the knots failed under load. Overall, 56 of 250 knots (22%) tied by experienced surgeons failed. For the postgraduate year 4 or 5 residents, the aggregate knot failure rate was 26% for the 220 knots tied. Group C residents had an 11% knot failure rate (half the overall faculty rate, P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: The FAST workstation and knot tester offer a simple and reproducible educational approach for enhancement of arthroscopic knot-tying skills. Our data suggest that there is significant room for improvement in the quality and consistency of these important arthroscopic skills, even for experienced arthroscopic surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative study.

Assessing Diagnostic Arthroscopy Performance in the Operating Room Using the Arthroscopic Surgery Skill Evaluation Tool (ASSET).

PURPOSE: To determine the validity and reliability of using the Arthroscopic Surgery Skill Evaluation Tool (ASSET) to assess arthroscopic skill in the operating room. METHODS: Eight orthopaedic residents, 1 sports medicine fellow, and 3 sports medicine faculty members recorded the diagnostic portion of 3 shoulder and 3 knee procedures in the operating room. Two blinded raters used the ASSET to assess each recorded procedure video. Criterion for a passing score on a procedure was attaining a 3 or greater in all 8 domains assessed. RESULTS: In total 70 videos (36 shoulder, 34 knee) were evaluated by each rater. The attending/fellow group was assigned significantly higher mean ASSET scores compared with resident groups for both procedures (P = .01). The attending/fellow group also had the highest passing percentage (95.8%). Raters were in agreement for total ASSET scores assigned to both diagnostic arthroscopy of the shoulder (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.84) and knee (ICC = 0.81). Agreement on individual ASSET domains was moderate (ICC = 0.61 to 0.80) for all domains except safety and difficulty of procedure. Raters concurred on the pass-fail evaluation in 62 of 70 (88.6%) of procedures evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Using the ASSET to assess surgical skills in the operating room is feasible, reliable, and valid. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When combined with previously published results using the ASSET, the ASSET may provide a validated and reliable method for evaluating arthroscopic surgical skills in the surgical simulation lab and operating room.

Improving residency training in arthroscopic knee surgery with use of a virtual-reality simulator. A randomized blinded study.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of articles in the surgical literature demonstrating transfer validity (transfer of training). The purpose of this study was to assess whether skills learned on the ArthroSim virtual-reality arthroscopic knee simulator transferred to greater skill levels in the operating room. METHODS: Postgraduate year-3 orthopaedic residents were randomized into simulator-trained and control groups at seven academic institutions. The experimental group trained on the simulator, performing a knee diagnostic arthroscopy procedure to a predetermined proficiency level based on the average proficiency of five community-based orthopaedic surgeons performing the same procedure on the simulator. The residents in the control group continued their institution-specific orthopaedic education and training. Both groups then performed a diagnostic knee arthroscopy procedure on a live patient. Video recordings of the arthroscopic surgery were analyzed by five pairs of expert arthroscopic surgeons blinded to the identity of the residents. A proprietary global rating scale and a procedural checklist, which included visualization and probing scales, were used for rating. RESULTS: Forty-eight (89%) of the fifty-four postgraduate year-3 residents from seven academic institutions completed the study. The simulator-trained group averaged eleven hours of training on the simulator to reach proficiency. The simulator-trained group performed significantly better when rated according to our procedural checklist (p = 0.031), including probing skills (p = 0.016) but not visualization skills (p = 0.34), compared with the control group. The procedural checklist weighted probing skills double the weight of visualization skills. The global rating scale failed to reach significance (p = 0.061) because of one extreme outlier. The duration of the procedure was not significant. This lack of a significant difference seemed to be related to the fact that residents in the control group were less thorough, which shortened their time to completion of the arthroscopic procedure. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated transfer validity (transfer of training) that residents trained to proficiency on a high-fidelity realistic virtual-reality arthroscopic knee simulator showed a greater skill level in the operating room compared with the control group. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We believe that the results of our study will stimulate residency program directors to incorporate surgical simulation into the core curriculum of their residency programs.

Evaluation of skill level between trainees and community orthopaedic surgeons using a virtual reality arthroscopic knee simulator.

BACKGROUND: Several virtual reality simulators have been developed to assist orthopaedic surgeons in acquiring the skills necessary to perform arthroscopic surgery. The purpose of this study was to assess the construct validity of the ArthroSim virtual reality arthroscopy simulator by evaluating whether skills acquired through increased experience in the operating room lead to improved performance on the simulator. METHODS: Using the simulator, six postgraduate year-1 orthopaedic residents were compared with six postgraduate year-5 residents and with six community-based orthopaedic surgeons when performing diagnostic arthroscopy. The time to perform the procedure was recorded. To ensure that subjects did not sacrifice the quality of the procedure to complete the task in a shorter time, the simulator was programmed to provide a completeness score that indicated whether the surgeon accurately performed all of the steps of diagnostic arthroscopy in the correct sequence. RESULTS: The mean time to perform the procedure by each group was 610 seconds for community-based orthopaedic surgeons, 745 seconds for postgraduate year-5 residents, and 1028 seconds for postgraduate year-1 residents. Both the postgraduate year-5 residents and the community-based orthopaedic surgeons performed the procedure in significantly less time (p = 0.006) than the postgraduate year-1 residents. There was a trend toward significance (p = 0.055) in time to complete the procedure when the postgraduate year-5 residents were compared with the community-based orthopaedic surgeons. The mean level of completeness as assigned by the simulator for each group was 85% for the community-based orthopaedic surgeons, 79% for the postgraduate year-5 residents, and 71% for the postgraduate year-1 residents. As expected, these differences were not significant, indicating that the three groups had achieved an acceptable level of consistency in their performance of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Higher levels of surgeon experience resulted in improved efficiency when performing diagnostic knee arthroscopy on the simulator. Further validation studies utilizing the simulator are currently under way and the additional simulated tasks of arthroscopic meniscectomy, meniscal repair, microfracture, and loose body removal are being developed.

Using the arthroscopic surgery skill evaluation tool as a pass-fail examination.

BACKGROUND: Examination of arthroscopic skill requires evaluation tools that are valid and reliable with clear criteria for passing. The Arthroscopic Surgery Skill Evaluation Tool was developed as a video-based assessment of technical skill with criteria for passing established by a panel of experts. The purpose of this study was to test the validity and reliability of the Arthroscopic Surgery Skill Evaluation Tool as a pass-fail examination of arthroscopic skill. METHODS: Twenty-eight residents and two sports medicine faculty members were recorded performing diagnostic knee arthroscopy on a left and right cadaveric specimen in our arthroscopic skills laboratory. Procedure videos were evaluated with use of the Arthroscopic Surgery Skill Evaluation Tool by two raters blind to subject identity. Subjects were considered to pass the Arthroscopic Surgery Skill Evaluation Tool when they attained scores of ≥ 3 on all eight assessment domains. RESULTS: The raters agreed on a pass-fail rating for fifty-five of sixty videos rated with an interclass correlation coefficient value of 0.83. Ten of thirty participants were assigned passing scores by both raters for both diagnostic arthroscopies performed in the laboratory. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that logging more than eighty arthroscopic cases or performing more than thirty-five arthroscopic knee cases was predictive of attaining a passing Arthroscopic Surgery Skill Evaluation Tool score on both procedures performed in the laboratory. CONCLUSIONS: The Arthroscopic Surgery Skill Evaluation Tool is valid and reliable as a pass-fail examination of diagnostic arthroscopy of the knee in the simulation laboratory. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study demonstrates that the Arthroscopic Surgery Skill Evaluation Tool may be a useful tool for pass-fail examination of diagnostic arthroscopy of the knee in the simulation laboratory. Further study is necessary to determine whether the Arthroscopic Surgery Skill Evaluation Tool can be used for the assessment of multiple arthroscopic procedures and whether it can be used to evaluate arthroscopic procedures performed in the operating room.

The Arthroscopic Surgical Skill Evaluation Tool (ASSET).

BACKGROUND: Surgeries employing arthroscopic techniques are among the most commonly performed in orthopaedic clinical practice; however, valid and reliable methods of assessing the arthroscopic skill of orthopaedic surgeons are lacking. HYPOTHESIS: The Arthroscopic Surgery Skill Evaluation Tool (ASSET) will demonstrate content validity, concurrent criterion-oriented validity, and reliability when used to assess the technical ability of surgeons performing diagnostic knee arthroscopic surgery on cadaveric specimens. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Content validity was determined by a group of 7 experts using the Delphi method. Intra-articular performance of a right and left diagnostic knee arthroscopic procedure was recorded for 28 residents and 2 sports medicine fellowship-trained attending surgeons. Surgeon performance was assessed by 2 blinded raters using the ASSET. Concurrent criterion-oriented validity, interrater reliability, and test-retest reliability were evaluated. RESULTS: Content validity: The content development group identified 8 arthroscopic skill domains to evaluate using the ASSET. Concurrent criterion-oriented validity: Significant differences in the total ASSET score (P < .05) between novice, intermediate, and advanced experience groups were identified. Interrater reliability: The ASSET scores assigned by each rater were strongly correlated (r = 0.91, P < .01), and the intraclass correlation coefficient between raters for the total ASSET score was 0.90. Test-retest reliability: There was a significant correlation between ASSET scores for both procedures attempted by each surgeon (r = 0.79, P < .01). CONCLUSION: The ASSET appears to be a useful, valid, and reliable method for assessing surgeon performance of diagnostic knee arthroscopic surgery in cadaveric specimens. Studies are ongoing to determine its generalizability to other procedures as well as to the live operating room and other simulated environments.

Can magnetic resonance imaging predict posterior drawer laxity at the time of surgery in patients with knee dislocation or multiple-ligament knee injury?

BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicate that isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries demonstrate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical evidence of healing when treated nonoperatively; however, the authors are unaware of any other study that has looked at whether initial MRI can predict posterior cruciate ligament stability at the time of surgery in patients with knee dislocation. HYPOTHESIS: An MRI grading system will predict laxity on posterior drawer testing at the time of surgery in patients with knee dislocations. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Forty-two consecutive patients with knee dislocation or multiple-ligament knee injury evaluated by MRI were included in the study. An assignment of grade 0 (intact), grade I (injured/fibers intact), grade II (partial tearing of ligament), or grade III (complete tear) was made after each reading on 2 separate occasions by 3 surgeons. Posterior laxity of the knee was graded by the magnitude of excursion on the posterior drawer test by the senior author at the time of surgery. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the MRI grading scheme expressed by the kappa statistic κ, as well as the predictive value of MRI grade in determining stability of the posterior cruciate ligament at the time of surgery, was assessed. RESULTS: The posterior cruciate ligament injury grading scheme tested demonstrated moderate to substantial intraobserver agreement (κ = 0.66, κ = 0.53, and κ = 0.52, respectively, for all raters). Interobserver reliability demonstrated only moderate agreement (κ = 0.49). If the grading scheme was changed to group both grades 0 and I (intact) and grades II and III (disrupted), intraobserver reliability demonstrated substantial to almost perfect agreement (κ = 0.83, κ = 0.80, and κ = 0.75), and interobserver reliability demonstrated substantial agreement (κ = 0.70). If the posterior cruciate ligament was classified as intact (grade 0 [intact] or grade I [injured]) on initial MRI, the injured knee was judged clinically stable (tibia anterior to or flush with the femoral condyles on posterior drawer testing) at the time of surgery 98.5% (95% confidence interval, 93%-100%) of the time. When the posterior cruciate ligament was classified as disrupted (grade II [partial tear] or grade III [complete tear]), the injured knee was judged unstable (tibia posterior to the femoral condyles on posterior drawer testing) 57.5% (95% confidence interval, 40%-73%) of the time. CONCLUSION: The presented system of grading posterior cruciate ligament injury in patients with knee dislocation on initial MRI demonstrates moderate to substantial interobserver and intraobserver reliability that increases if the grading scheme is modified. An initial MRI scan read as grade I may predict stability to posterior drawer at the time of surgery. Even with MRI evidence of disruption in the posterior cruciate ligament (grade II and grade III injuries), posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction may not be clinically indicated at the time of reconstruction and/or repair of other associated injuries.

Are evidence-based protocols which identify vascular injury associated with knee dislocation underutilized?

A concerning number of patients referred to our clinic with knee dislocations have not been thoroughly evaluated for popliteal injury. The objective of this study is to present our experience and attempt to identify possible causes for this trend. Thirty-one consecutive patients with knee dislocations referred over a 1-year period were evaluated. Patients were assigned to either of two groups: Group I included all patients initially evaluated with an evidence-based protocol for identifying clinically significant vascular injury associated with knee dislocation, and Group II included all patients who had not received an evidence-based evaluation. The main outcome measure was delay in the diagnosis of a limb threatening vascular injury (>8 h) within each group. Six out of the 31 patients referred, were evaluated for vascular injury without an evidence-based protocol. These patients were significantly more likely to have had a delay in the diagnosis of their vascular injury beyond 8 h (P = 0.032) and were less likely to have been evaluated at a level I trauma center (P < 0.001). As expected, evidence-based protocols are superior when compared to initial pedal pulse examination alone for identifying surgically significant vascular injury within 8 h. The consequences of a delay in diagnosis beyond 8 h can be catastrophic and one patient in this series required an above-knee amputation. This is not new information, however, a significant number of patients with knee dislocations continue to be evaluated solely by initial pedal pulse examination. Though effective protocols exist, orthopedic surgeons must work to facilitate the implementation of these protocols at their referring institutions.

Lessons learned from a case of proximal humeral locked plating gone awry.

A 59-year-old woman underwent plate fixation of her 2-part anatomic neck proximal humerus fracture through an open anterolateral approach. The fixation subsequently failed, and the operation resulted in a dense axillary nerve palsy. Six weeks after her initial procedure, she was returned to the operating room. Exploration of the nerve revealed that it was compressed beneath the plate and irreparably damaged. Sural nerve cable grafting was required in an attempt to salvage deltoid function. The recent introduction of proximal humeral locking plates provides an opportunity for surgeons to reevaluate their methods of managing proximal humerus fractures. Indications for operative fixation have broadened, and a renewed interest in the anterolateral surgical approach has been reported. This case is the first description of an axillary nerve injury occurring in association with the open anterolateral approach when used for the treatment of a proximal humerus fracture and serves as a reminder that surgeons considering the use of a lateral approach must have a thorough understanding of axillary nerve anatomy. An additional review of the case provides a forum for discussion of the anterolateral approach to the proximal humerus and an opportunity to highlight the methods that can be used to optimize fixation when locked plates are employed. It must be emphasized that our enthusiasm for advances in technique and technology should not distract from basic surgical principles when treating these fractures.

A cadaveric study examining acromioclavicular joint congruity after different methods of coracoclavicular loop repair.

A basic principle in the treatment of joint injuries is to restore congruity with the hope that restoration may lessen the incidence of late arthritis. The acromioclavicular (AC) joint is frequently injured. Many AC joint injuries are treated nonoperatively; others are treated surgically. Coracoclavicular loop repair of the AC joint is believed to lead to anterior displacement of the clavicle relative to the acromion. This cadaveric study evaluated the effectiveness of three techniques of coracoclavicular loop repair in restoring AC joint congruity through measurement of anterior displacement. Fourteen shoulders were repaired by the three different techniques, all of which consisted of fixation through a drill hole in the clavicle and around the crook of the coracoid with a suture. The techniques only varied by the placement of the drill hole in the clavicle (ie, either posterior, middle, or anterior). The results of this study indicate that as the drill hole moved anteriorly on the clavicle, joint congruity was more closely approached and less anterior displacement of the clavicle occurred. However, none of the methods of coracoclavicular loop fixation restored full AC joint congruity.